Education is an act of hope. The work is fundamental to a democracy, and it cannot be done in a silo. Planning a lesson, delivering a lesson in a way that reaches and engages all students, assessing a lesson, and reviewing said lesson is a tremendous undertaking. It takes days, hours, and minutes that are rarely seen by anyone other than the educators themselves. All of those parts of teaching (planning, delivery, assessment, and review) are themselves acts of hope.
The hope that the lesson takes root. The hope that the delivery connects with all learners in the room. The hope that the assessment reflects the effort of both the educator and the student. The hope that the review will offer blind spots for further growth.
In a recent blog post, Meghan Lawson pointed out the distinction between wishing and hoping, which she points out are often conflated. A wish is something that one does with candles on a cake for a birthday. As I've detailed above, hope is much more intentional and takes substantially more work. And as it turns out, hope is much more transformational.
Ms. Lawson detailed her growth around the science of hope that started with Jamie Meade, the former vice president and chief of staff for Battelle for Kids. Ms. Meade then led her to the psychologist C.R. Snyder, who developed the hope theory. There are three components:
- Goals: establishing personally meaningful goals.
- Pathways: uncovering multiple ways to achieve each goal.
- Agency: believing we can overcome obstacles to achieve our goals.
Ms. Lawson also shares two more facts about hope, distinguishing it further from a wish.
- The first is from the book Hope Rising, by Casey Gwinn, J.D., and Chan Hellman, Ph.D. "The predictive power of hope is greater than any other character strength."
- The second returns to Ms. Meade, who points out, "Several academic studies indicate that hope is a more robust predictor of future success than a student's ACT score, their SAT score, and their GPA. In fact, hope is a greater predictor than GPA as to whether or not a college freshman will return to campus in the second semester."
- College Board PSAT and SAT assessments have been restructured over the last year, with this cohort data reflecting student use on the new digital platform Bluebook. The platform has reconfigured the assessment design, making the PSAT and SAT adaptive assessments based on student responses.
- The scoring mechanism for these adaptive assessments is no longer the same. In previous years, these assessments used classical test theory: an equal number of items were incorrect for you and me, and we received the same score. Now, the assessments are using item response theory, a model that accounts for the fact that students may guess and might get different scores with the same number of right/wrong based on the rigor of what is right/wrong.
- As such, the Math and English Language Arts (ELA) data are not comparable to previous trend data.
So, where does this leave us?
With the science of hope. With goals, pathways, and agency. With a predictive power greater than any other character strength. With a robust predictor of future success. We're right back where we started this conversation.
Education is an act of hope.